Outsourced revenue cycle management costs most US practices 3% to 8% of insurance collections. Published rates run from 2.5% for practices collecting $1M or more a month to 8% of allowed amounts for small behavioral health practices. At $90,000 a month in collections, that is $2,700 to $7,200 a month, before setup or minimum fees.
The rate on the contract is the least important number in an RCM quote. In our billing reviews, 19% of denied claims were never reworked or appealed, so a practice paying 4% to a vendor that lets denials sit loses more than one paying 6% to a team that works every denial. Price the recovered dollars, not the percentage.
Methodology:This page uses four Luxen datasets: Luxen client data (38 client practices, Jan 2024 to Jun 2026), Luxen billing reviews (410 practice billing reviews, Jan 2025 to Jun 2026, with in-house cost from 96 practices that shared payroll data), Luxen claim audit (61,400 claims audited, Jan 2025 to Jun 2026) and the Luxen Practice Manager Survey 2026 (286 practice managers, March 2026). Public prices and rules come from the linked sources.
Most US practices pay an outsourced revenue cycle management company 3% to 8% of what it collects from insurance each month. Published rates show both ends of that range. One billing company lists rates as low as 2.5% for practices collecting $1M or more a month and 5% to 6% for practices collecting around $100,000 a month. A behavioral health biller charges 6.5% to 8% of the allowed amount. MGMA puts the common industry estimate for billing and RCM costs at around 5% of collections.
In dollars, a practice collecting $90,000 a month pays $2,700 at 3%, $4,500 at 5% and $7,200 at 8%. The rate is only part of the revenue cycle management cost. The rest is what the percentage is charged on, which extras sit outside it, and how many dollars the vendor recovers that you were leaving behind. In our practice manager survey, 44% could not name the fee basis in their current billing contract, which is where most overpaying starts.
RCM pricing follows four models: a percentage of collections, a fee per claim, a flat monthly fee, or a hybrid of a percentage plus fixed charges. The model matters less than the base it is applied to.
This is the most common model. The vendor keeps a share of what actually lands in your account, so it only earns when you get paid. Rates fall as volume rises, because the vendor's cost per claim drops. Solo practices, low-volume practices and complex specialties pay the top of the range. Ask whether patient payments count as collections. Some contracts include them, which puts a fee on money your front desk collected at check-in.
Some vendors charge a fixed amount for every claim submitted. To compare it with a percentage, divide the fee by your average payment per claim. If your average paid claim is $110, a 5% fee equals $5.50 a claim. Per-claim pricing favors practices with high-dollar claims and costs more for practices with many low-dollar visits. It also pays the vendor again for every resubmission unless the contract says otherwise.
Flat monthly fees suit practices with very stable volume. Hybrids pair a lower percentage with a monthly minimum, a per-provider fee or a software charge. A $1,500 monthly minimum turns a 4% rate into an effective 6% for a practice collecting $25,000 a month. Convert every offer into one effective percentage of collections before you compare.
A percentage of billed charges is a different deal from a percentage of collections. A practice that bills $200,000 in charges and collects $90,000 pays $10,000 at 5% of charges and $4,500 at 5% of collections. Some vendors charge on the allowed amount, which includes the patient's share whether or not the patient ever pays it. Collections is the only base where the vendor's income moves exactly with yours.
Setup fees, monthly minimums, clearinghouse charges, credentialing, patient statements and legacy AR work are the usual extras, and together they can move the effective rate by one to two points. Ask for each one in writing.
A 3-provider practice collecting $90,000 a month, or $1,080,000 a year, would pay $32,400 a year at 3%, $48,600 at 4.5% and $64,800 at 6%. Keeping billing in-house at the fully loaded rate we measured would cost $85,320.
That in-house rate comes from our billing reviews: fully loaded in-house billing cost 7.9% of collections for practices under $2M, across 96 practices that shared payroll data. It holds up against public numbers. One full-time medical records specialist at the BLS median wage of $51,140 already equals 4.7% of this practice's collections, before benefits, payroll tax, the billing software, the clearinghouse, training and cover for time off. Most 3-provider practices need more than one person once eligibility checks and insurance calls are counted.
The chart shows the spread on $1.08M a year in collections: $32,400 at 3%, $48,600 at 4.5%, $64,800 at 6% and $85,320 in-house at 7.9%.
The fee is only the cost side. Across our clients, net collection rate rose from 91.4% to 97.8% over the first six months. If this practice matched that change on the same allowed amounts, monthly collections would rise from $90,000 to about $96,300, or about $75,600 more a year. At a 6% fee, the vendor keeps about $4,500 of that gain and the practice keeps about $71,100. Cash timing improves too: median days in AR dropped from 54 to 33 within 120 days, which brings three weeks of cash forward.
For most practices collecting under $2M a year, yes. Outsourced fees of 3% to 6% sit below the 7.9% in-house cost we measured, and the gap widens once turnover is counted. In-house billing can cost less for large groups that spread a billing manager and a full team across many providers, keep staff for years and already run clean electronic workflows.
Staffing is where small in-house teams lose money. In our survey, 34% of practice managers replaced a biller in the past two years, and open biller roles took a median 67 days to fill. Claims stop being worked while a seat is empty. Practice managers also estimated 11 staff hours a week on insurance calls and portal checks. The CAQH Index puts the provider cost of a manual claim status check at $13.80, against $3.64 for an electronic one, so teams that work by phone and portal pay for it in labor.
Whoever does the work, the rules are the same. Medicare requires electronic claims under the Administrative Simplification Compliance Act unless a physician practice has fewer than 10 full-time equivalent employees. Outsourcing moves the work, not the obligations, which is why the fee should be judged against the whole revenue cycle, from eligibility to patient balances, not just claim submission.
A full-service medical billing contract should cover eligibility checks, charge entry, coding review by certified coders, claim submission, payment posting, denial work, AR follow-up and patient billing. The denial work is where the fee earns back its cost, because most practices leave denied money on the table.
In our claim audit, eligibility and coverage errors caused 24% of denials, coding and modifier errors caused 21% of denials, and missing or invalid prior authorization caused 17% of denials. Duplicate claims made up 9% of denials, mostly from resubmitting instead of correcting. Timely filing caused 6% of denials, and only 4% of those were recovered. Medicare's own limit is one calendar year from the date of service, and many commercial payers allow less.
The chart splits denials by cause: eligibility and coverage 24%, coding and modifiers 21%, prior authorization 17%, duplicate claims 9%, timely filing 6% and all other causes 23%.
The cost of not working denials is larger than any fee. In our billing reviews, 19% of denied claims were never reworked or appealed, and 42% of practice managers said nobody owns denial follow-up full time. A vendor with a dedicated denial and AR recovery team should appeal what can be won. Appeals filed by Luxen were overturned 68% of the time.
Across 38 client practices, first-pass denial rate fell from 14.2% to 6.1% within 90 days of onboarding, clean claim rate rose from 89.6% to 97.3% in the first 90 days, and net collection rate rose from 91.4% to 97.8%.
Compare RCM quotes by turning each one into a single effective percentage of your real collections, then checking what work and reporting that percentage buys.
For the vendor side of the decision, see the types of medical billing companies and what each charges and our guide on how to choose a medical billing company for a small clinic. If you want the numbers run on your own AR, a free billing review takes 30 minutes.
The most expensive mistake is choosing on the headline rate. A low percentage on billed charges, or a low rate with a high monthly minimum, can cost more than a higher rate on collections.
Want to know how this applies to your practice? We will review your AR and denials, free, in 30 minutes.
Book the reviewFor a practice collecting $90,000 a month, a percentage of collections between 3% and 8% costs $2,700 to $7,200 a month. The table converts each model to the same practice so you can compare like with like.
| Pricing model | How it is charged | Cost at $90,000 a month collected | Best fit | Watch for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of collections | 3% to 8% of insurance collections | $2,700 to $7,200 | Most practices | Whether patient payments count |
| Percentage of charges | A share of billed charges | $10,000 at 5% on $200,000 billed | Rarely a good deal | Pays on money never collected |
| Per claim | Fixed fee per claim submitted | About $4,500 at $5.50 a claim on 818 claims | High-dollar claims | Fees on resubmissions |
| Hybrid | Lower percentage plus a minimum or per-provider fee | $3,600 at 4% with a $1,500 minimum | Growing practices | Minimums in slow months |
| In-house team | Salaries, benefits, software, clearinghouse | $7,110 at 7.9% of collections | Large groups with a billing manager | Turnover and empty seats |
Dental billing runs on CDT codes and the ADA claim form, with frequency limits and annual maximums shaping what gets paid. The fee should cover narratives and attachments: dental practices wrote off a median $23,400 a year in restorative claims denied for missing narratives or X-rays. Ask whether medical cross-coding on the CMS-1500 is included, since medical cross-coding opportunities were missed in 64% of dental practices reviewed. Our dental practice case study shows what recovered claims add up to.
Therapy visits are low dollar and time based, which makes per-claim pricing expensive: a $5 fee on a $95 visit is already 5.3%. A percentage of collections usually fits better. The work is in the rules. 8-minute rule unit errors appeared on 9% of therapy claims, and the KX modifier was missing on 21% of Medicare therapy claims past the threshold. See how physical therapy billing handles units, plans of care and modifiers.
Behavioral health billing is priced toward the top of the range. One public price list charges 6.5% to 8% of the allowed amount plus a monthly fee per provider. Session time must support the code billed: 18% of 90837 claims had documented session time under 53 minutes. Claims sent to the wrong plan add delay, and solo therapists carried a median 41 days in AR, against 29 for group practices. More on billing for therapists.
Ambulance billing is heavy on Medicare and Medicaid, mileage units and documentation, so price quotes should state who chases Physician Certification Statements. They were missing or unsigned on 18% of non-emergency transports. Aged AR is the main cost: ambulance agencies carried 37% of AR past 90 days. At King-American Ambulance, days in AR went from 71 to 38 after handover.
Primary care has high claim volume and modest payments per visit, so a percentage of collections is usually cheaper than per-claim pricing. The fee should include capturing work practices miss: chronic care management time went uncaptured for 58% of eligible patients. Wellness visits need care too, since problem-oriented visits billed with an annual wellness visit lacked modifier 25 on 12% of claims. Primary care practices carried a median 36 days in AR. See primary care billing.
Some do and many do not. Setup fees, where they exist, are usually charged per provider or per location to cover system access, payer enrollment checks and workflow setup. Ask whether onboarding, credentialing updates and the clean-up of claims already in progress are included or billed separately, and get the answer in the contract rather than the proposal.
Cost to collect is total revenue cycle cost divided by total cash collected, the formula HFMA uses in its MAP Keys. MGMA notes that billing and RCM costs are often estimated at around 5% of collections. Include staff, software, clearinghouse and vendor fees in the numerator, not just the billing company’s invoice, or the figure will look better than it is.
A well-run handover takes about two weeks from a signed BAA to working claims. Across our clients, the median was 9 business days to first claims worked and first recovered payments arrived a median of 17 days after work began. Delays usually come from missing system access, payer portal logins or an unclear list of claims already in progress.
Yes. Many practices keep front-desk work and charge entry in-house and outsource denial management and AR follow-up, eligibility and prior authorization, coding review or credentialing. Partial scopes are usually priced as a lower percentage, a contingency rate on recovered dollars, or a per-task fee. Make sure one side clearly owns each step so claims do not fall between teams.
Terms vary widely. Some billing companies sign month-to-month agreements with 30 days’ notice, while others ask for one to three years with early termination fees. Longer terms sometimes come with a lower rate. Before signing, check the notice period, any fee on claims still in progress when you leave, and how quickly your data and reports are returned.
At a minimum, a monthly report should show collections against charges, net collection rate, days in AR, AR by age and payer, denials by reason and dollar value, and appeal outcomes. A vendor that cannot show denials by reason cannot prove it is working them, and that gap is the most common reason practices change billing vendors.
A free 30 minute review of your AR ageing and denial reasons. We tell you what is recoverable and what it would take. No deck, no commitment, no fee.
Book a free billing review